Anything Engine Optimization The rolling record of the AI-search industry.
A deep field carrying one large glyph.
Illustration: AEO Wire
advocacy — interested party; nonpublic member survey, sample size not stated in the brief
S.D.N.Y. court filing (In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation) · Oct 29 Law & MoneyResearchSEO

Digital Content Next brief puts publisher traffic decline at 22% in 2026, OpenAI court told

What this answers

How much has publisher traffic fallen since AI Overviews, according to Digital Content Next?
In a court filing, Digital Content Next said traffic referred to its surveyed members fell a median 22% year over year in an eight-week window in 2026, after a median 10% fall in the same window in 2025. The survey is nonpublic and the trade group is an interested party.
What did Digital Content Next tell the court in the New York Times v. OpenAI case?
It filed a proposed amicus (friend-of-the-court) brief on Oct. 29, 2026 backing the news publishers' motion for summary judgment (a ruling without a trial), arguing AI retrieval substitutes for publishers' pages and hurts the market for their work.

Digital Content Next (DCN), a trade group for U.S. digital publishers, filed a proposed friend-of-the-court brief on Oct. 29 backing the news plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (a ruling without a trial) in In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation, per the filing and Press Gazette. DCN said a nonpublic survey of its members found median year-over-year traffic referred to them fell 22% in an eight-week window in 2026, after a median 10% fall in the same window in 2025, and that unique visitors to member sites fell 26% from 2023 to 2025 (page views down 18%, visits down 16%). It also said members’ advertising and total revenue each fell 5% in 2025.

The brief says the survey was compiled by DCN itself and not previously published, and does not state how many members responded. DCN is an interested party; it argues the traffic losses show AI retrieval substitutes for publishers’ pages and harms the market for their work, a point that bears on fair use.

Why it matters: Publisher-side traffic losses are now being put before a federal court as evidence on the fair-use "market harm" question, so the 2026 figure is both a data point and a litigation position.

The record: AI training & copyright litigationOpenAIGoogle AI Overviews

Via S.D.N.Y. court filing (In re OpenAI Copyright Infringement Litigation) ↗ · Press Gazette ↗

Posted to the wire October 30, 2026. Edited by Joe Balewski.